*Explain the topic you want to research. What do you think your final persuasive essay will be about? Add as much detail as you can
Topic is that Should parents ban children from the internet?. And I disagree with this.
- Adults means a mature, fully developed person => such as parents
- Children mean people who are not yet an adult.
What are my guiding questions?
*What questions are you curious about?
I wonder why adults protect children from using the internet. I think using the internet is not always bad. It has lots of positive effects such as http://www.wordsnneedles.com/2014/05/5-reasons-why-you-should-not-ban.html .
What do you want to know?
I already know about this topic and both sides. But I want to ensure that parents are allowed children to use the internet. This is not harm for them but good for them.
What questions do you think your reader will have?
I appeal my thoughts which insist the opposit to the topic. So the reader will have a thought which is about the negative effects of using the internet. Or they consider Which is better banning children or not.
What are my current thoughts?
*What do you already know about your topic?
I already know about this topic and both sides.
What are your opinions?
I disagree with this topic.
What do you want to persuade people of?
I emphasize the positive effects of using the internet. In our society, the internet is important, especially for children. They must know how to use it inevitably. So parents should not ban children from the internet.
What is the opposition?
*What will your opponents say?
They will talk about the negative such as http://blogs.babycenter.com/mom_stories/3112014-ban-kids-from-handheld-devices-electronics/ - 5 reasons why we should ban little kids from electronics(text) : negative
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-458919/Parents-ban-children-internet-chatrooms-fears-paedophiles.html - Parents ban children from internet chatrooms over fears of paedophiles( the article) : negative
HTTP://WWW.HUFFINGTONPOST.COM/CRIS-ROWAN/10-REASONS-WHY-HANDHELD-DEVICES-SHOULD-BE-BANNED_B_4899218.HTML - 10 Reasons Why Handheld Devices Should Be Banned for Children(article) : negative
What is the common belief that you are arguing against? The excessive using is bad for children.
What counterarguments do you anticipate?
http://blogs.babycenter.com/mom_stories/3112014-ban-kids-from-handheld-devices-electronics/ - 5 reasons why we should ban little kids from electronics(text) : negative
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-458919/Parents-ban-children-internet-chatrooms-fears-paedophiles.html - Parents ban children from internet chatrooms over fears of paedophiles( the article) : negative
HTTP://WWW.HUFFINGTONPOST.COM/CRIS-ROWAN/10-REASONS-WHY-HANDHELD-DEVICES-SHOULD-BE-BANNED_B_4899218.HTML - 10 Reasons Why Handheld Devices Should Be Banned for Children(article) : negative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Articulation
1) My argument Write your argument in one sentence. Then, spend some time explaining it.
Parents should not ban children from the internet. Now, we live in the information-oriented society. So, it is no longer a problem to use the internet even for children. They can obtain lots of information from it.
2) How I found my argument Explain how your research helped you find your argument. Or, in other words, how did your research evolve into your argument? Start with your research question.
There have been many disputes over the proper way to allow children using the internet. So between two sides, I chose "Parents should not ban children from the internet."
3) New research questions What do you still need to know? What is your research plan?
I curious about both sides` insists. So I will try to know their thoughts and I determind my opinion based on these.
At first, I`ll research the articles about the topic. And, I devide them into two sides. Maybe, I need to a con side.
4) Connections to the Harvard Sampler How is your argument connected to the Harvard Sampler? ANY CONNECTION IS VALID. Please focus on choosing a good argument first, then think about how it is related to the Harvard Sampler. I will help you think of the connection if necessary.
The Internet and Hieronymus Bosch: Fear, Protection, and Liberty in Cyberspace (Internet Fear) - Fear that children will associate online with bad people has led to tracking and------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Articulation
1) My argument Write your argument in one sentence. Then, spend some time explaining it.
Parents should not ban children from the internet. Now, we live in the information-oriented society. So, it is no longer a problem to use the internet even for children. They can obtain lots of information from it.
2) How I found my argument Explain how your research helped you find your argument. Or, in other words, how did your research evolve into your argument? Start with your research question.
There have been many disputes over the proper way to allow children using the internet. So between two sides, I chose "Parents should not ban children from the internet."
3) New research questions What do you still need to know? What is your research plan?
I curious about both sides` insists. So I will try to know their thoughts and I determind my opinion based on these.
At first, I`ll research the articles about the topic. And, I devide them into two sides. Maybe, I need to a con side.
4) Connections to the Harvard Sampler How is your argument connected to the Harvard Sampler? ANY CONNECTION IS VALID. Please focus on choosing a good argument first, then think about how it is related to the Harvard Sampler. I will help you think of the connection if necessary.
monitoring requirements and to a market in “nanny software” to make parents aware
of their children’s wanderings through cyberspace. Of course, the same technologies
that can control personal computer use by American children can be directed at
monitoring the activities of citizens of totalitarian regimes—or even in the United
States, where the Defense Department’s Total Information Awareness program was
killed only when Congress became aware of its potential as a program of civilian
surveillance.
